Talk: Diamond

Revision as of 10:10, 15 September 2008

Great! I also tried to do something with the diamond structure in the past, but couldn't find something worthwhile. Well done! --Amafirlian 09:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Praise of the praiseworthy is praise indeed. (as Aragorn said) There is more coming, you can replace the atoms by icosahedra. How do I categorize these foamy structures? Polyhedra or Deltahedra give the wrong flavor.

--Leo Dorst 06:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Good point. We need a new category! I would suggest to also use Category:Modular Design. --Amafirlian 20:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Good job!

Wow, kudos for the large version. It seems I 'knew' you from before you started on the Geomag, Leo. The puzzle pieces came together today when I took a look at you home page. I've been perusing your Lego schematics more than once in the past. :)

--Peter Jepsen 10:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Good point. We need a new category! I would suggest to also use [[:Category:Modular Design]]. --[[User:Amafirlian|Amafirlian]] 20:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
+== Good job! ==
+Wow, kudos for the large version. It seems I 'knew' you from before you started on the Geomag, Leo. The puzzle pieces came together today when I took a look at you home page. I've been perusing your Lego schematics more than once in the past. :)
+--[[User:Peter Jepsen|Peter Jepsen]] 10:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)